RAYZER
Well-known member
- 3,380
- 59
- 48
- Location
- sanford/florida
Steel Soldiers now has a few new forums, read more about it at: New Munitions Forums!
Thanks for more information in support of burning WMO in a deuce.That is not quite right. I have had both, turbo(m35) and non turbo trucks(m109). Both ran used oils just fine. It has been stated the used oils will wear your injection pump.
OK, so this is good analysis of engine internal working parts and whether they will be in contact with the WMO in such a way that it could cause excess wear on the engine. Rayzor's conclusion is the only place where wear is going to occur is in the fuel system, ie injectors and IP. So, if the fuel has been properly dewatered and filtered, say 1-3microns, then there should be no wear on the fuel system, because abrasive particles that small are only going to function as a polish.This has always been the speculation.
It seems that "IF" the increased ash in the wmo causes increased engine wear, it would be to the cylinder walls, rings, valve guides,hydraulic head plunger and mating surfaces, and injector tip internal machined plunger surfaces.
On the other hand, any of the engine internal bearing surfaces shouldn't be affected because they're not coming in direct contact with the wmo, although some small amount of extra ash will wind up In the crankcase oil just as it does when burning #2.
So, it would make sense that if exsessive wear was going to take place it would show up first in the fuel system IE the injection pump and injectors.
Now, after running various blends of filtered wmo for 3 years, I just replaced my injection pump due to an issue that I haven't figured out yet, but my injectors were all fine, in fact perfect.
So,Is 3 years and 15,000 of burning wmo blend as fuel enough time to cause exsessive wear?
Was my injection pump issue due to burning wmo? I don't know.
Did wmo have anything to do with my blown head gasket? maybe, but I don't think so.
Is the secret to burning some wmo as fuel "proper filtering" before dumping it into the fuel tank? Yes!
Disclaimer:I'm not a scientist and your results may vary.
I agree photos would be good of the same engine parts from a mulitifuel engine that was only run on D2; however, personal testimonies do help as long as it is not BS.What is needed are photos (NOT personal testimony. Without pictures, it didn't happen.) from engines that have run #2 diesel EXCLUSIVELY for comparison.
My bet is that wmo fuel that has been filtered and thinned properly does not produce much more ash (aka coke, "crust" etc. in the local idiom) than is produced by #2 diesel fuel.
Certainly not in the amounts that the anti-wmo fuel folks predict.
Hopefully, I will get an opportunity to examine IP's and etc. from both wmo and straight diesel burning engines.
I was just going to ask what "straight #2 diesel" injectors look like- guess I'll have to wait.What is needed are photos (NOT personal testimony. Without pictures, it didn't happen.) from engines that have run #2 diesel EXCLUSIVELY for comparison.
My bet is that wmo fuel that has been filtered and thinned properly does not produce much more ash (aka coke, "crust" etc. in the local idiom) than is produced by #2 diesel fuel.
Certainly not in the amounts that the anti-wmo fuel folks predict.
Hopefully, I will get an opportunity to examine IP's and etc. from both wmo and straight diesel burning engines.
Thanks, Squirt-Truck. Your D-2 only multifuel looks a lot cleaner than the above engines that had run WMO. But the engines that had run WMO still look pretty good for having run garbage as fuel for so many miles.For reference only,
Pictures of a multi, LDS-1A, 15000, DF-2 only.
This "cup" is part of the hyper cycle design.For us non- mechanics, what's the purpose of the hole on top of the piston?
How much clean up if any to the tops of these pistons?For reference only,
Pictures of a multi, LDS-1A, 15000, DF-2 only.
Thank youThis "cup" is part of the hyper cycle design.
Fuel is injected into this cup.
Ask and you shall receive!Thank you
..umm, hyper cycle??
Brilliant on the head crane!The pistons were not cleaned at all, that is what they were like when the heads came off.
Gimp, The bracket on the frame rail is a clamp on base for a lifting rig to support the heads for removal and re-installation. Think of if as a mini davit crane. Reaches from the heads to past the fender. Use a small hoist and no straining in or out.
We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website like our supporting vendors. Their ads help keep Steel Soldiers going. Please consider disabling your ad blockers for the site. Thanks!