rustystud
Well-known member
- 9,361
- 3,257
- 113
- Location
- Woodinville, Washington
Since tearing down all these 303M HydraMatics I've come across several things of interest. The number one being what is the difference between a 302M and a 303M unit. We know that the military had durability problems with the 302M . The question has always been "why" ?
Over time I have found out several things wrong with the 302M unit. The biggest being the front clutch only having three fiber plates instead of the five it has now.
I've now found and confirmed another big one. The front "servo" .
In the 302M transmission the "apply piston" is noticeably smaller, compared to the later 303M unit.
The left on is from a 302M and the right one is from a 303M .


The problem I've found though is this smaller servo was not always changed out when converting the 302M to a 303M unit. I have seen several 303M's have this smaller servo. The TM 9-8025-2 lists the size of the servo bore in the 303M to be 1.438" which is the larger bore shown above.
The size difference makes a big difference in the "holding" power of the front band so if your 303M has the smaller servo you should try and change it out to the larger size servo.
Over time I have found out several things wrong with the 302M unit. The biggest being the front clutch only having three fiber plates instead of the five it has now.
I've now found and confirmed another big one. The front "servo" .
In the 302M transmission the "apply piston" is noticeably smaller, compared to the later 303M unit.



The problem I've found though is this smaller servo was not always changed out when converting the 302M to a 303M unit. I have seen several 303M's have this smaller servo. The TM 9-8025-2 lists the size of the servo bore in the 303M to be 1.438" which is the larger bore shown above.
The size difference makes a big difference in the "holding" power of the front band so if your 303M has the smaller servo you should try and change it out to the larger size servo.
Attachments
-
5 MB Views: 1