Barrman
Well-known member
- 5,266
- 1,782
- 113
- Location
- Giddings, Texas
I want to start this with an apology. I am still climbing the Duece learning curve. I feel that I have been asking and asking but not contributing here. That should change once I get my two completely apart and learn how they go back together. Thank you all for the help I have already gotten.
My 1951 REO M35 has axles that look just like the modern Rockwells to me. They say Timken on them though. The previous owner who "I ran a motor pool for a number of years." Thinks he knows it all. He told me the axles on my truck have the CV joints at the front compared to the more modern U-Joint versions. Is this right? I have always heard that CV versions are weaker. The previous owner preaches that the CV's are better for driving and stronger. "They changed to u-joints because they are cheaper, not better." Pistolnut noticed that the drive shaft flanges and gear housings are different than his M35A2. What else is different and which is better?
Thanks.
My 1951 REO M35 has axles that look just like the modern Rockwells to me. They say Timken on them though. The previous owner who "I ran a motor pool for a number of years." Thinks he knows it all. He told me the axles on my truck have the CV joints at the front compared to the more modern U-Joint versions. Is this right? I have always heard that CV versions are weaker. The previous owner preaches that the CV's are better for driving and stronger. "They changed to u-joints because they are cheaper, not better." Pistolnut noticed that the drive shaft flanges and gear housings are different than his M35A2. What else is different and which is better?
Thanks.