Steel Soldiers now has a few new forums, read more about it at: New Munitions Forums!
Ditto. The only units that mounted any other .30 cal were ARVN units, who had a real hodge-podge of equipment and a few Air Force security installations. Anything bigger than a .30 was not authorized, doesn’t mean it wasn’t done though. Heck (substitute your own word here) we even had a 40mm grenade launcher pulled off of a downed Cobra on one of our M151s and a .50 Ma Deuce on an M37 (also not authorized).I vote for M60 on the MUTT. More appropriate for the Vietnam era than the M1919 Browning.
If you are looking at the semi-auto version of any of these, then legally they are considered a rifle.Rifles are shoulder fired. So I'd say an M16 or a M14. Now if you meant a Dummy belt fed crew served weapon / rifle then the only option of those listed is the standard M60. It also filled the crew served weapon role like the Browning 1919A4 and the Browning M2 .50 BMG but those aren't rifles by definition as they are not shoulder fired.
BH
Well I'm not looking for any of them and I don't want this thread to stray to far into a thread that will get closed due to the no gun talk rules so I will just say that a rifle is a shoulder fired weapon by definition. And a replica of a belt fed gun found on a mutt would be a replica of a machine gun. The OP stated he wanted a replica gun not a live gun in either F/A or S/A so those would be non guns.
And he did state he wanted a replica of a rifle not a machine gun and of those listed the M60 is the only one capable of being fired from the shoulder making it the closest thing listed to a rifle by definition.
We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website like our supporting vendors. Their ads help keep Steel Soldiers going. Please consider disabling your ad blockers for the site. Thanks!