70deuce
Active member
- 936
- 121
- 43
- Location
- Franktown, CO
Here is a series of pictures that shows the comparison of two nice looking wreckers. M816 vs M936A2. Not a whole lot of difference until you look at them from the front.
-
Steel Soldiers now has a few new forums, read more about it at: New Munitions Forums!
Wrecker (M816) vs Wrecker (M936A2) in Pictures
- Thread starter 70deuce
- Start date
70deuce
Active member
- 936
- 121
- 43
- Location
- Franktown, CO
A few more. Also rewound about 50 feet of the front winch line while I had a nice resistance to pull.
Attachments
- 608
- 38
- 28
- Location
- Newark ca
I would take an M816 over the 936a2 any day 1st it will out run (on a grade) the 936a2 and will out winch it too.
I have used both in the"real world" the hydraulic winch will not pull as hard before it goes into bypass and stops pulling.
I would use an 936/a1 same engine as 816 .
I have used both in the"real world" the hydraulic winch will not pull as hard before it goes into bypass and stops pulling.
I would use an 936/a1 same engine as 816 .
- 2,186
- 86
- 48
- Location
- Zimmerman MN
Talk about wrecker ****! How do I explain to my wife we need an 816 too?
- 3,222
- 392
- 83
- Location
- Tonopah, AZ
Nice looking trucks!!!
- 2,186
- 86
- 48
- Location
- Zimmerman MN
Yes, they are on both sides.
70deuce
Active member
- 936
- 121
- 43
- Location
- Franktown, CO
There are 6 steel plates stacked behind each end of the bumper. Can't see them weighing more than 300 lbs each side.
Attachments
Monkeyboyarmy
Well-known member
- 1,337
- 194
- 63
- Location
- Kingsville,Oh.
That one is my favorite wrecker. The other one is my favorite too. They both look great.