Wingnut13
Well-known member
- 235
- 562
- 93
- Location
- Strafford, NH
I ran across this test conducted on FMTV's for the Army. I searched around to see if someone has posted this before, didn't find it. Forgive me if it has been discussed before. It's nice to see some real numbers and not just speculation of synthetic oils vs what Army likes to run. To save you the read I'll post below the down and dirty summary.
Link to the test. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA622985.pdf
And the summary
An evaluation of fuel consumption using three FMTVs showed the potential for significant improvement using advanced lubricants. For the engine and transmission, the baseline OE/HDO- 15/40 oil was replaced with a candidate Single Common Powertrain Lubricant (SCPL). The GO- 80/90 baseline for the axles was replaced with synthetic SAE 75W-90 oil selected by TARDEC. Over a two-speed highway cycle, an average improvement of 6.1% was observed. When operated on a cycle which included stationary idle and transients, the average fuel consumption improvement increased to 7.8%.
Seems like a less expensive way to increase milage over gear swaps, or will help those who already have done them to get even better milage.
~Wingnut
Link to the test. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA622985.pdf
And the summary
An evaluation of fuel consumption using three FMTVs showed the potential for significant improvement using advanced lubricants. For the engine and transmission, the baseline OE/HDO- 15/40 oil was replaced with a candidate Single Common Powertrain Lubricant (SCPL). The GO- 80/90 baseline for the axles was replaced with synthetic SAE 75W-90 oil selected by TARDEC. Over a two-speed highway cycle, an average improvement of 6.1% was observed. When operated on a cycle which included stationary idle and transients, the average fuel consumption improvement increased to 7.8%.
Seems like a less expensive way to increase milage over gear swaps, or will help those who already have done them to get even better milage.
~Wingnut