Steel Soldiers now has a few new forums, read more about it at: New Munitions Forums!
Microsoft MSN, Live, Hotmail, Outlook email users may not be receiving emails. We are working to resolve this issue. Please add support@steelsoldiers.com to your trusted contacts.
Grim stuff. You can almost hear the conversation in the Engineering Department now:
- "Well. That didn't work so well."
- "Yeah, you're right. Let's tweak it a little and see how that works."
- "Okay. Now, who's next in our pilot rotation?"
:burn::3dAngus:
Easy enough with today's computer capabilities to synchronize thrust of that thing from the six engines.
But I'm imagining that was a l-i-t-t-l-e trickier back in the day when that subtlety was likely managed mostly through seat-of-the-pants "engineering" from the pilot.
Any multi-engine...
Absolutely, and then when you consider recent conversation in the SR-71 "Blackbird" Thread about issues of yaw in-flight, this thing must have had some of those issues.
The number of airfields you can operate from with that airframe must have also been an issue.
Wonder if they ran it through any Immelmann Turns or Barrel Rolls during test flights?! :naner:
I stumbled by accident on her autobiography, and if you have time to read her story you won't be disappointed. She was not your everyday wallflower.
I recall she wrote something about the "complexity" (she understated most everything she did) of using three tugs to get the Gigante glider...
That's not it at all.
It would just help a WHOLE lot if manufacturers took the simple step of a plain label. Like, how tough is that?
It's rare, though.
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website like our supporting vendors. Their ads help keep Steel Soldiers going. Please consider disabling your ad blockers for the site. Thanks!