Maybe we could start generating some? This is SteelSoldiers, if I'm not mistaken. They also serve who only stand and generate.
I was thinking about the problem of 400 Hz power when I saw a turbine powered genset on GL. I assumed they used 400 Hz more on aircraft because of the normally high RPM of turbine engines. If the genset is geared down from the turbine shaft power output, then 400 Hz isn't as far to gear down as 60 Hz.
But then I thought, is there a convenient gear ratio to go from 400 to 60? I knew there wasn't an integer ratio because 6 goes into 42, not 40, but integer-wise, how close could you get? Well, 400/7 = 57.14. Most 60 Hz equipment I've ever heard of wouldn't be able to tell 57.14 Hz power from 60 Hz power with a 4.76% variance.
So, just average the power output over 3 full cycles and a half cycle to produce a 60 Hz peak. Then, do it again, to produce the 60 Hz trough. The averaging would just be a simple rectifier charging a capacitor, a really big capacitor. Using simple digital control electronics to count the peaks and troughs and some really beefy solid state relays, while one capacitor (trough or peak) is charging, the other is discharging, either pushing its electrons out onto the hot lead, or recharging, filling its holes from the hot lead.
If the voltage of the 400 Hz generator is still 120, then the 57 Hz power thus created would be much higher voltage than 120 VAC, but then, that's what a transformer is for, transform the HVAC 57 Hz back down to 120 VAC 57Hz.
A pair of rectifiers, a pair of capacitors, a pair of SPDT solid state relays, and an oil-cooled transformer. Not sure, but I think the capacitor stage would even satisfy most PFC requirements. The only difficulty would be that the digital switching would introduce a lot of distortion, more than the transformer stage could reasonably compensate for. But, if the equipment can tolerate a 5% variance in the frequency, then a little distortion in the sinusoidal waveform isn't gonna freak it out much either.
This scheme is a little more involved then just rectifying to pulsed HVDC, filtering and smoothing, and then using a PWM, but it has the benefit of not needing nearly as complicated a set of digital control electronics, and distorted though it may be, I'd think the waveform generated would be much cleaner than a PWN generated waveform.
Does any of this make sense, or have I been out of a college physics classroom too long?