December 11th, 2008.
The military had a reason for the 6/12V systems in WW2, and the 24VDC systems after that..... It's what the NATO trucks use, for its size it's a simpler, more powerful system, and for the diesels, it gives you some reserve for cold starts without ether.
On the railroad our headlights and auxilliaries were 32, then 64, and finally 75VDC, and the passenger cars (railroad) went 32/64/75 then 110 VDC before the conversions to HEP, and it was done to reduce ampereage at a given load.
We would benefit from 24 or even 48 VDC electricals on most vehicles today as it would physicially reduce the size of the starters and generators for a given load. I'll have to check my manual, but I belive the 1963 Swiss S404.114 Unimogs use a 3 phase AC alternator, (Mike Pop can weigh in here for me.....!)
but the output is reduced to 24VDC for the batteries, lights and such. The Unimogs originally used the same slave plugs as the deuces, mine has none, but the later ones used the NATO standard slave plugs as we do today on the more modern military vehicles. Model T Fords varied from 7 to 24 VDC on the magnetos, and yes, they could curl your hair if you screwed up (Mechanical DArwinism)! Ask anyone whos been shocked by a Model T ignion coil.....
I'd vote for 24VDC, as I've had less trouble with it overall.....
Just my .02 worth.....
Sincerely,
Kyle F. McGrogan