msgjd
Well-known member
- 1,112
- 3,414
- 113
- Location
- upstate ny
I'm re-motoring a former army commercial truck that had a big-cam NTC-230, by installing a NTC-290 big-cam series-1 that was in a privately-owned M818 wreck I purchased for parts for my other M809's etc. The 230 had a pot-style flywheel for dual-disk clutch, and the 290 had a flat flywheel for single-disk clutch. The 290's flywheel/clutch/tranny/bellhousing were not with truck when I purchased it.
1: Are any models of the SC or BC 855ci family of a different crank balance type? I'm thinking they are all internally balanced, but we all know what sarge would say if we think. I do know the 230 had an external harmonic balancer, as it was a taper-shaft crank, which failed at the usual spot.
2: Does anyone know if I will have to change the clutch linkage or bell housing to accomodate the differences between a pot flywheel type and a flat type, because the pressure plate on a pot-type sits several inches closer to the tranny? Maybe is enough adjustment in the stock setup to accomodate different TO-bearing locations?
3: I also want to ensure I get the proper clutch/pp for the torque, the engine tag does not list torque and I cannot find online a freely-disclosed torque output for a NTC290bc. (unrelated to my issue, but out of curiosity I wonder if the stock M809-series flywheel/clutch/pp would be able to handle a 290's output) . Not a lot of HP difference between the 230, 250, 270, and 290's, however, turning up fuel makes everything have a boundary somewhere and I would think an NTC has more torque than a NHC. The fuller roadranger the 290 will be mating to has a 2" input shaft. ------- update: I found a sales brochure (generator) listing the NTC290 at 840'# @ 1500rpm. I already knew the NTC230bc is rated at 805'# @ 1500rpm, and just a recap for some out there, the NHC250sc is around 685'#.
I have not been able to find any heavy truck mechanics around here who have swapped pot-style and flat-style flywheels, so lets see what we can find here on this great site. TY
1: Are any models of the SC or BC 855ci family of a different crank balance type? I'm thinking they are all internally balanced, but we all know what sarge would say if we think. I do know the 230 had an external harmonic balancer, as it was a taper-shaft crank, which failed at the usual spot.
2: Does anyone know if I will have to change the clutch linkage or bell housing to accomodate the differences between a pot flywheel type and a flat type, because the pressure plate on a pot-type sits several inches closer to the tranny? Maybe is enough adjustment in the stock setup to accomodate different TO-bearing locations?
3: I also want to ensure I get the proper clutch/pp for the torque, the engine tag does not list torque and I cannot find online a freely-disclosed torque output for a NTC290bc. (unrelated to my issue, but out of curiosity I wonder if the stock M809-series flywheel/clutch/pp would be able to handle a 290's output) . Not a lot of HP difference between the 230, 250, 270, and 290's, however, turning up fuel makes everything have a boundary somewhere and I would think an NTC has more torque than a NHC. The fuller roadranger the 290 will be mating to has a 2" input shaft. ------- update: I found a sales brochure (generator) listing the NTC290 at 840'# @ 1500rpm. I already knew the NTC230bc is rated at 805'# @ 1500rpm, and just a recap for some out there, the NHC250sc is around 685'#.
I have not been able to find any heavy truck mechanics around here who have swapped pot-style and flat-style flywheels, so lets see what we can find here on this great site. TY
Last edited: