turbovr6jetta
Member
- 171
- 0
- 16
- Location
- Bellingham Wa
So then I would be lead to believe that Chuck Norris would be the only person that could enforce any sort of penalty for parking in a low emmiting/fuel efficient parking space.
Steel Soldiers now has a few new forums, read more about it at: New Munitions Forums!
Can't help you with that sticker, but I have this one ready to go on the bob.All of this Green environmental Cr*p is just that CR*P. How many Prius's will be around in 40 years let alone 10. Most of our trucks will out last these little pieces of cr*p by ten fold easily. So how much pollution is produced to create 10 Prius's and dispose of ten of them. My guess way more pollution then our GREEN trucks.
Also if any one knows where to find these stickers I need a few
Ryan
I just copied this and pasted it on my Facebook account.. Well said. ThanksWhen I think about the prius I don't think about the fuel efficiency. Efficiency can be determined with a high level of bias. But I think more about Sudbury Canada. That is where Toyota buys its 1000 tons of nickel every year. It is mined there cause huge effects all on its own. But a few miles out of town is also where the nickel smelting takes place. Nickel smelting is bad stuff! The landscape it sudbury is nothing but a baron wasteland. All this for batterys that only last a maximum of 10 years before you have to throw away the car or buy another mother nature slapping buckle battery. Oh not to mention having to frieght it to Japan so they can build the batterys and freight them back over here. Cargo ships are pretty fuel efficient I'm sure. I'll try to stick with things that are built on our on continent out of materials that aren't and toxic as plutonium to produce
And here I go again, off subject...
I've been wondering for a while now... Just how hard is it to park a deuce at a store or something... And tips?
Thanks... But I still plan on spending a couple hrs of my free time in an empty parking lot..lolIt's easy, I just park on the outer end of the lot, and take about 5 spots. funny enough, nobody ever parks close to me though.
Just to be clear, are you singling out the creation of the prius for all or most of Sudbury Ca.'s past pollution problems? Hmmmmm I think that looks like a facinating topic to do some google searching about.When I think about the prius I don't think about the fuel efficiency. Efficiency can be determined with a high level of bias. But I think more about Sudbury Canada. That is where Toyota buys its 1000 tons of nickel every year. It is mined there cause huge effects all on its own. But a few miles out of town is also where the nickel smelting takes place. Nickel smelting is bad stuff! The landscape it sudbury is nothing but a baron wasteland. All this for batterys that only last a maximum of 10 years before you have to throw away the car or buy another mother nature slapping buckle battery. Oh not to mention having to frieght it to Japan so they can build the batterys and freight them back over here. Cargo ships are pretty fuel efficient I'm sure. I'll try to stick with things that are built on our on continent out of materials that aren't and toxic as plutonium to produce
No. I am not that well educated on the subject well enough. I suppose I should do some more research. Im sure sudbury had a good share of polution before hand but toyota buying 1000 tons of nickle a year is very substaintial and the mining and smelting should be considered in the ecological impact of the car. Not te mention that in real world testing the prius doesnt get very good milage compaired to many other vehicles. The prius engine is not a low emisions engine nor is it very efficiant engine compaired to most sports cars. The only thing that it slightly has above most cars is regenerative braking. In my opinion a slight bit of efficiancy added on to a rather inefficiant vehicle by using a disposable battery that does an good deal of damage to the planet that I hope my children will someday get to enjoy is just not worth it. I dont mean to single out the prius but its been around longer than most and is in high production. I also have yet to research any other vehicle, mostly because every idiot in my town is fooled by the " its so much better for the enviroment" prius. There are lots of them here. That is why i use it as exampkeJust to be clear, are you singling out the creation of the prius for all or most of Sudbury Ca.'s past pollution problems? Hmmmmm I think that looks like a facinating topic to do some google searching about.
No. I am not that well educated on the subject well enough. I suppose I should do some more research. Im sure sudbury had a good share of polution before hand but toyota buying 1000 tons of nickle a year is very substaintial and the mining and smelting should be considered in the ecological impact of the car. Not te mention that in real world testing the prius doesnt get very good milage compaired to many other vehicles. The prius engine is not a low emisions engine nor is it very efficiant engine compaired to most sports cars. The only thing that it slightly has above most cars is regenerative braking. In my opinion a slight bit of efficiancy added on to a rather inefficiant vehicle by using a disposable battery that does an good deal of damage to the planet that I hope my children will someday get to enjoy is just not worth it. I dont mean to single out the prius but its been around longer than most and is in high production. I also have yet to research any other vehicle, mostly because every idiot in my town is fooled by the " its so much better for the enviroment" prius. There are lots of them here. That is why i use it as exampke