Really grasping at straws to cling to the GL-5 is bad for you myth?
The statement was that GL-5 is the cause for the gear to fail, and they redesigned the gear several times... but that mean old GL-5 simply will not lubricate the gear as well as GL-1 did.
BULL HOCKEY.
Unless you have some drawings or engineering reports?
As I stated, and you glossed over, there are MULTITUDES of bad designs in MVs. Reference the Go Devil L134 jeep engine and the jeep transfer case. That's what I know of..... I'm sure there are tons of other examples but I own a jeep so I know that specifically.
GL-1 is the same thing as GL-5.. they both use a base mineral oil. The Gl-5 has EP additives (that means it has more lubricating additives that GL-1 which only contains some anti-foaming stuff).
Transmissions are splash lubed. There may have been a very real cause for no lube splashing into the spot they needed it to go to... but if you have two oils, the same temp, viscosity, etc but 1 is GL-1 and the other is GL-5 if you believe that the reason the gears were failing was because the GL-5 was not lubricating it 'enough' then GL-1 was also not because they are, essentially, the exact same thing. GL-5 specs are in addition to the GL-1 specs. So everything GL-1 can do, GL-5 can do it, and more.
If you want to parse every noun and verb fine, have at it.. but I would not further pursue this train of thought... it makes absolutely no sense.