• Steel Soldiers now has a few new forums, read more about it at: New Munitions Forums!

  • Microsoft MSN, Live, Hotmail, Outlook email users may not be receiving emails. We are working to resolve this issue. Please add support@steelsoldiers.com to your trusted contacts.

M26 Tank Recovery Vehicle.

Motorpool-Mac

New member
25
0
1
Location
Rapid City South Dakota USA
here are a few photos of this truck - yes i believe that it is an M26A1. it has three winches and 7 fair tires - the other three are not so good. as i said before there is no fifth wheel hitch nor does it have the wrecker poles.
 

Attachments

Capt.Marion

Active member
1,811
15
38
Location
Atlanta, GA
Elwenil said:
Cool pics, thanks for posting! How in the world do you get in and out of that thing? The chain drive is certainly very odd and I wonder what the reason for choosing that type of drivetrain? Also, that's a pretty odd place to find a Georgia license plate, lol.
All the heavy trucks of like the 40s and 50s (dump trucks etc...) were chain drive and used solid tires... at least the civvy ones.
 

Crash_AF

Active member
1,530
7
38
Location
Colorado Springs, CO
It appears that the drive shaft drives the axle in the center that runs the sprocket between the rear wheels, then the chains drive the actual wheels.

Later,
Joe
 

madsam

New member
1,106
4
0
Location
M
Maybe I am wrong, but it looks like the bent frame corresponds to the bent pressure tanks underneath. Could the 5th wheel have been pulled on so hard that it bent the frame and tanks when it came off?
 

Capt.Marion

Active member
1,811
15
38
Location
Atlanta, GA
Crash_AF said:
It appears that the drive shaft drives the axle in the center that runs the sprocket between the rear wheels, then the chains drive the actual wheels.

Later,
Joe
Either that or its for a winch. I'm not sure where they're located.
 

Motorpool-Mac

New member
25
0
1
Location
Rapid City South Dakota USA
I dealt for the M26A1 yesterday – now all I have to do is figure out how to get it home. We may try to get it running on the spot. I’m not sure I really want to tackle a restoration project this big …if any of you are interested make me an offer.

Thanks!
Daniel
 

M813rc

Well-known member
Steel Soldiers Supporter
4,208
3,197
113
Location
Near Austin, Texas
tamangel said:
Why an unarmored type? for use in non-combat theaters?

Mike
Yes, when you don't actually need armour, the sheet metal cab took 21,000# off the vehicle weight (!).

Elwenil said:
How in the world do you get in and out of that thing?
The doors on both cab types are on the sides near the rear (where the star is on the armoured cab).

Cheers
 

Gordon_M

New member
40
0
0
Location
Falkirk, Scotland
Well done for grabbing that, I'm jealous.

It looks like the fifth wheel was just ripped off it, but the chassis aren't that hard to come by (I'm talking relatively here...they made 1372 according to the book) Original engine, winches, cab roof frame, even the USA number - good stuff.

Check the voltage too. As I understand it the M26 was the 12 volt production armoured version, followed by a much smaller batch of 12 volt production M26A1. Some time later a bunch of the armoured M26's and / or unarmoured M26A1s were converted to 24 volt unarmoured M26A2, so you could have a chassis number from anywhere in the production sequence and either 12 or 24 volt electrics. The Doyle / Stansell book has several photos of M26A1 USA 598093 in Germany in 1956

An M26A1 rescued from a French scrapyard has just vanished from a dealers listing here in the UK, I think it had the wrong engine in it, but the correct engine came with it. Not huge ££££ / $$$$ but I didn't even ask the other half if she would even think about letting me have another toy.

Mind you, if the lottery kicks in to my retirement fund any time soon I'll remember you have one for sale, though it would cost as much to ship that to the UK as it would to buy the same thing here. If all else fails stick it in a corner with a sheet over it - money in the bank long term.

Gordon, in Scotland
 

KaiserM109

New member
1,108
4
0
Location
SE Aurora, CO
tamangel said:
Why an unarmored type? for use in non-combat theaters?
We drove a lot of unarmored stuff in the 15th Combat Engineers in Viet Nam. On July 4th I chatted with a combat engr. who just returned from Afganastan and am happy to hear that the Army is finally wising up to the idea that it would be nice to protect the crew from an IED blast. I guess the Army is having a hard time replacing lost soldiers.
 

Gordon_M

New member
40
0
0
Location
Falkirk, Scotland
The armour on the M26 was a good idea, but probably not that useful.

It added about ten tons to the weight of the tractor unit, ballpark 25 tons with armour and 15 tons without. You had to take out the windows to put the armoured shields in place, and it wouldn't have stopped much more than small arms fire I think. With a top speed of under 30 mph it wouldn't get out of the area that quickly either. The sheer weight of the armour also contributed to a lot of front axle breakages too I seem to remember, if you look at the armoured version you can see that virtually all the armour weight is carried by the front axle.

I think the most effective IED protection was the old Rhodesian conversion of the British Bedford RL by putting a 'V' hull underneath it,a design which now seems to be appearing on all the current generation of new-builds. Here's hoping they work well for the people at the sharp end.

Gordon
 
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website like our supporting vendors. Their ads help keep Steel Soldiers going. Please consider disabling your ad blockers for the site. Thanks!

I've Disabled AdBlock
No Thanks