• Steel Soldiers now has a few new forums, read more about it at: New Munitions Forums!

  • Microsoft MSN, Live, Hotmail, Outlook email users may not be receiving emails. We are working to resolve this issue. Please add support@steelsoldiers.com to your trusted contacts.

M35A2 Transmission Fluid Change

Dasgog

Active member
177
148
43
Location
Tucson, AZ
Hello!

Alright so I have looked at several threads in regards to what fluid to use when changing my Transmission fluid and really all it did was confuse me more. Mainly because of the vast opinions of what I should use! I understand there are a lot of factors and also a lot of personal perspective .
I am here in AZ and I believe things run hotter...

As far as the procedure goes I got that, no concern, but I am on the fence with what to really use. It’s a 1972.

thank you for any help and really for all the help I have always received.
 

doghead

4 Star General /Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Steel Soldiers Supporter
26,246
1,179
113
Location
NY
As far as i am aware of, there are no new developments in oil technology that should change how you decide to use the data and opinions posted in this forum.

Gear oil works fine, has for over 50 years. Probably will for another 50 years.
 

Menaces Nemesis

"Little Black Truck" Conservator
Steel Soldiers Supporter
333
262
63
Location
Denver, Colorado
I feel your pain... Seems there's been quite a few lube opinion battles here on SS. Some folks swear by the non-detergent straight-weight motor oil, my trans hated it, especially when hot, made it a real PITA to shift. Runs much better with the gear oil in the link below, and it's nice to have just one lube for the trans, t-case, and diffs. Fine print on this gear lube says it's good for all GL-2, 3, 4 and 5 applications, and a cheap lube pump from harbor freight makes the job so much easier...

https://www.oreillyauto.com/detail/...-gallon/80041/4495694?q=masterpro+80w90&pos=2

https://www.harborfreight.com/gear-oil-and-fluid-pump-61746.html?_br_psugg_q=gear+lube+pump
 

cattlerepairman

Well-known member
Steel Soldiers Supporter
3,256
3,354
113
Location
NORTH (Canada)
I ran 80/90 gear oil in my transmission. That worked fine and I agree with other posters that in a warmer climate it is probably all you need. Where I am, even the margins of the winter (spring and fall) are cold enough to make initial shifting a very stiff affair.

After my OD mod I now run 40w straight non detergent oil. Shifting is also fine but the oil is thin. I did not overfill but on the first longer highway run the tranny puked quite a mess out from the front. Seems fine now and I leave it alone. I am considering switching to 50w.
 

NY Tom

Well-known member
Steel Soldiers Supporter
558
844
93
Location
Riverhead, NY
This thread could go on for a long time based on others...
I tried 50W Mobil Synthetic made for manual transmissions and my 1970 M35A2 did not like it. Tough to shift.
Switched to an ISO150 (~40W) straight non-detergent gear oil type product we use at work for stamping press recirculating lube and it seemed to be happier.
When I got the truck it was filled with 85W90 and shifting when cold was really tough.
The 40W seems good but leakage has increased unfortunately.
Transfer case was the same problem - filled with 85W140 and very hard to shift from high to low when cold. Switched out to 85W90 - shifts much better and leaks way more too...
 

frank8003

In Memorial
In Memorial
6,426
4,985
113
Location
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
The ancient question (circa 1960) of to use detergeant oil or non-detergenat oil answer is to see if that particualr lube system is circulating and pressurized.
If it is a gearbox of normal machines and is circulated by action of the parts but not by pump then the basic design is to allow that which does not belong in the lube oil to settle out to drain plug area. When lube liquid is changed out then the nasties go with it as per design.
As per the actual viscosity itself of lubes there is a chart. This does not have to do with additives.
Viscosity Chart.jpg
 

Menaces Nemesis

"Little Black Truck" Conservator
Steel Soldiers Supporter
333
262
63
Location
Denver, Colorado
From a post I wrote in a similar thread a few years ago...
FWIW, I believe transmissions could possibly have different druthers... The same way one brand-new engine may have more or less blow-by than the next, what works well in one trans may not work as well in another. One trans may have a bit tighter or looser clearances in a spot or two, maybe the synchro detents and springs are a bit grabbier, or more forgiving, in one trans than another. With these variances, maybe one trans prefers something that's a bit more viscous, or maybe less, depending on temperature and how it's being used. I've tried the straight-weight Non-Detergent oil, and the synthetics too. When using 50wND in my 3053A, it was flat-out noisy. After getting off the highway from an extended run, shifts from 1-2 with both the 50wND and Synthetic 50w were really reluctant and sticky. Mine seems to run quieter, cooler, and shift best with 80w90 GL4/5. YMMV.

I do drive my truck year-round, but only when temps are above freezing. I figure after 50+ years of service, the ol' boy is retired, the engine, all the seals and gaskets and other "soft parts" deserve to sleep in until it's above freezing.
 
Last edited:

Menaces Nemesis

"Little Black Truck" Conservator
Steel Soldiers Supporter
333
262
63
Location
Denver, Colorado
Another consideration is availability... if we're just looking for straight-weight oil without the "non-detergent" characteristic, that's easy. So's non-detergent oil in lighter viscosities (compressor oils). Seems the manufacturers of heavier weight non-detergents have kinda been phasing out the 40-50 wt smaller containers/consumer market (probably not much demand?). Although 40 and 50 wt non-detergent might still be had if one knows where to look, often times it won't be on the shelf of most local auto parts stores.
 
Last edited:

Katavic918

Active member
523
54
28
Location
Maryland
I have always used 90w mineral gear oil. Napa has 5 gal buckets for I think $60. Good luck with your decision. I don't see an end in sight for this thread.
 

fleetmech

Well-known member
200
386
63
Location
Connecticut
The lack of consensus has left me a little reluctant to change the trans oil in mine, but I eventually picked up some ND 30wt from tractor supply. Its on the list to be changed within the next few weeks. My '70 shifts ok as a rule, but a bit slow when cold especially that 1-2 shift. Mine has gear oil in it, but I'm switching to see how it likes the change.

FWIW I have (and put a lot of miles on) a 1969 Diamond Reo gasser (civilian truck) with the non-od variant of this same transmission that I filled with regular old 80w-90 long before I knew how the 'net worked. I remember being a bit surprised that the 1-2 shift seemed to actually get a bit stiffer with the new oil, but I wrote that off as being just a quirk. Bearing in mind that the previous owner ran it out of trans oil until the pto seized and stopped the truck cold, then sold it to me with about a quart and a half in it (first and only time to date ive felt a gear stick get that hot) I think most any lube in these things is going to be ok. That was close to 10 years ago and while that truck is now retired waiting on major chassis repairs and re-purposing, last it ran a year or so ago, the trans was still fine.

I find it interesting that this question also crops up a lot in the world of 'regular' classic cars as well, and I'm not aware that there is any real solution there either. With the knowledge I have now about the so called 'yellow metals' I would probably avoid any bottle that says "for un-synchronized transmissions", but my old Reo appears to be proof that it either doesn't matter or, as Menacers said above, is dependent on the whim of your particular gear box.
 

fleetmech

Well-known member
200
386
63
Location
Connecticut
Update to my post directly above: I'll soon be removing the 30ND from my trans and going back to some form of 80-90. Following the switch Ive been having a lot of slow, sticky feeling shifting and I don't like it at all. 2nd has become very hard to find and while I can still engage well enough, getting out of each gear is very draggy. The problems get noticeably worse as things get warmer, I did the change just as the weather broke.

I guess it is the whim of the transmission in question, but from my point of view, if its working, and it has been working, keep it.

Oh well.
 

Dasgog

Active member
177
148
43
Location
Tucson, AZ
Update to my post directly above: I'll soon be removing the 30ND from my trans and going back to some form of 80-90. Following the switch Ive been having a lot of slow, sticky feeling shifting and I don't like it at all. 2nd has become very hard to find and while I can still engage well enough, getting out of each gear is very draggy. The problems get noticeably worse as things get warmer, I did the change just as the weather broke.

I guess it is the whim of the transmission in question, but from my point of view, if its working, and it has been working, keep it.

Oh well.
From a local repairman who has “experience” with these vehicles he mentioned I should use 85/140 Travelers Gear Oil for Transmission, Transfer Case, Gear Box and Axles.
I am in Arizona and I wonder if that’s too wide a range?
 

cattlerepairman

Well-known member
Steel Soldiers Supporter
3,256
3,354
113
Location
NORTH (Canada)
I have seen 85W140 recommended for the axles to reduce the likelihood of leaks. I am not sure it would be great in the Spicer transmission when the temperatures dip. The manufacturer of said transmission recommended 30 or 40 weight engine oil which translates well to 80/90 gear oil. I do not intend to fan the flames. This is merely intended to compare. Here is another useful comparison: https://www.farmoyl.com/resources/sae-viscosity-grades
 

M35A2-AZ

Well-known member
Steel Soldiers Supporter
3,222
392
83
Location
Tonopah, AZ
I have been using this oil it is a GL-4, it has been working great, easy to shift.
CRC 24239 Multi-Purpose Gear Oil 85W90 SAE-Gallon,
 

Dasgog

Active member
177
148
43
Location
Tucson, AZ
Thank you both for the information.. I suppose there is a chance I did not hear the mechanic correctly and maybe he did mention 85/90 for Transmission. Ugh, I hope I am not ruining my transmission. Maybe I should drain it again and out 85/90 in it. Even by doing my own googling I see same conversations promoting 85/90.
I drive it once a week to keep it all supple so not too concerned as if it were a daily driver but maybe I should change it again regardless .
 

fleetmech

Well-known member
200
386
63
Location
Connecticut
Thank you both for the information.. I suppose there is a chance I did not hear the mechanic correctly and maybe he did mention 85/90 for Transmission. Ugh, I hope I am not ruining my transmission. Maybe I should drain it again and out 85/90 in it. Even by doing my own googling I see same conversations promoting 85/90.
I drive it once a week to keep it all supple so not too concerned as if it were a daily driver but maybe I should change it again regardless .
I'm not overly familiar with Arizona, but I do understand its rather warmer than the northeast! I probably wouldn't run 85/140 here...
 

V8srfun

Well-known member
423
538
93
Location
Altoona pa
If you compile all the information from all the threads on this subject it will boil down to this.

use yellow metal safe fluid.

viscosity is not all that important or in more words you may have to try a couple different fluids until you get the shift feel you want.


now on to some of my opinion. the presence of lubricant is far more important than the thickness of the lubricant. light truck and car transmissions are rated to take multi viscosity gear oil or automatic transmission fluid or even a 50/50 mix of both. At least that is how ford and Mazda service manuals were written. The manual suggests gear oil and if the customer does not like the shift feel try the atf.

I saw a interview with one of the engineers for tremec and he was all for the use of atf in their transmissions. He went on to say that atf has the capacity to properly lubricate and carry shock load. And that gear oil usually causes slow shifts and missed gears because the synchro needs to displace that heavy fluid before it can adequately grab the gear to get it spinning the right speed to engage. Remember synchronized transmissions work by the synchro creating friction on the gear to get it spin it he same speed as the output shaft allowing for a smooth engagement. If there is not enough friction shifts will become stiff slow and more prone to grinding gears.

The thicker the fluid the slower the shift and the thinner the fluid the less shock load it can absorb. You choose what works best for you and your transmission.
 

frank8003

In Memorial
In Memorial
6,426
4,985
113
Location
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
Changing transmission and transfer case lubricating fluids is easy to do and not expensive. Read post #6 again and have at it. Do not put that drain oil into the fuel tank. see TM 9-2520-246-34-1 to see what your dealing with.
Change the fluids, drive it and see what works best for your machinery.
Please post your happy results. There is no need for this thread to die.
I used NEW squish washers on the drains and did not overtorque the plugs.
The non-detergeant I used alleviated all my noisy and hard to shift problems allowing use of T case when shifting up and down thru the gears without glitches or problems in South Florida summer. Being the sole driver I was successful and happy with my selection and work.
You pick, buy, and changeout the fluids and You drive it and report back here Please.
All machines do like new lube fluids, can't hurt.
In photo is squish washers for axels or engine or something, can't remember. but you do see it is AN part and gives leads. NAPA has them. Use new ones
They on on the expendable parts list somewhere.
 

Attachments

NebraskaFan

Member
51
37
18
Location
Kemmerer, Wyoming
Well i bought SAE 40 ND last week planning to change my transmission and tcase fluid to it, but after finding this thread I'm not so sure. Anyone else have more input on the topic?
 
Top