F18hornetM
Active member
- 1,135
- 10
- 38
- Location
- Ocean City, Md
Thanks alot, Looks like 2 seperate bills regarding historic tags with HB 668 covering trucks over 10k.
After reading both, looks like big difference that would affect us, is the removal of "incidental" use as far as trucks are concerned.
I disagree with this, but I understand why. People who misuse the historic tags, use their vehicles under "incidental use" everyday.
Somebody mentioned before, no need to change the law just inforce it. If a trooper sees a historic vehicle go by everyday, maybe he should stop them and ask why!
These trucks and any other vehicle needs to be driving some. My son and I try to drive ours once a week, usually only a few miles to visit parents or brother, but enough to keep things working and batteries charged.
If this passes, guess I'm going to join alot of clubs.
I am still going to write letters, If a person has an antique vehcile such as a 1960 chevy, wouldnt they want to take a drive on summer day? Well so do I. And these bills will prevent that for everyone
After reading both, looks like big difference that would affect us, is the removal of "incidental" use as far as trucks are concerned.
I disagree with this, but I understand why. People who misuse the historic tags, use their vehicles under "incidental use" everyday.
Somebody mentioned before, no need to change the law just inforce it. If a trooper sees a historic vehicle go by everyday, maybe he should stop them and ask why!
These trucks and any other vehicle needs to be driving some. My son and I try to drive ours once a week, usually only a few miles to visit parents or brother, but enough to keep things working and batteries charged.
If this passes, guess I'm going to join alot of clubs.
I am still going to write letters, If a person has an antique vehcile such as a 1960 chevy, wouldnt they want to take a drive on summer day? Well so do I. And these bills will prevent that for everyone
Last edited: