ryanruck
Active member
- 427
- 46
- 28
- Location
- Cincinnati, OH
So far as I know, the only official memo was the one from 4/17 regarding HMMWVs and their off road status (which I believe to actually be incorrect considering the prior NHTSA rulings that HMMWVs are primarily on road vehicles), essentially reaffirming how off road vehicles are to be operated under Ohio law. It did not address anything regarding retitling them once they meet equipment safety requirements, nor did it address any other military vehicles.HB710 in the last session was focused on HMMWVs. Any new legislation should be written to clear up the problem for all MVs. There is plenty of useful information in the threads in the "politics" forum from the issues in Virginia, Michigan, Washington State, etc., and also the success stories in GA, LA, KY etc. Key points are the MIL-STD and its acceptance as equivalent to FMVSS by the NHTSA and the Appellate court in Wisconsin.
It will be much easier to pass a law without opposition from the administrative branch of the government, or there is a risk of veto as happened in Michigan. It would be good to know where the opposition is coming from and also the basis. I have never seen any sort of official memo from the Ohio BMV stating reasons for the MV registration issues. Does such a memo exist?
There has been a change in the Ohio Governor's office, also a new Director of Public Safety, under which the BMV falls. Maybe it is worth a shot to try to engage the administrative branch at some level, either directly or with one or more legislators supporting the effort.
If there is anything coming down from the DPS HQ, it is not official and is why they need put in their place.
Ideally I'd like to see OH follow KY's lead on a standardized MV inspection/registration process. With the OKI partnership on a number of things, it is a potential possibility. But then again, this is Ohio we're talking about here so I won't hold my breath.