• Steel Soldiers now has a few new forums, read more about it at: New Munitions Forums!

  • Microsoft MSN, Live, Hotmail, Outlook email users may not be receiving emails. We are working to resolve this issue. Please add support@steelsoldiers.com to your trusted contacts.

Upgraded deuce's tires to Goodyear G177 11.00R20s (dualed)

Valence

Well-known member
Steel Soldiers Supporter
2,112
555
113
Location
Davis County, UT
Spacers arrived today. The plates came plastic wrapped together with thick foam padding on one side. Shipping probably could have been a little cheaper in a USPS flat rate box. Oh well.

They look good. I'm just rattle can painting them. Probably black since hot pink isn't really my thing. ;)

2015-08-25 18.48.35.jpg 2015-08-25 18.49.48.jpg 2015-08-25 19.08.50.jpg

I aim to have them installed Friday/Saturday. Maybe then I can start looking at caster adjustment.
 

TB58

Member
289
2
18
Location
Fayetteville, Nc
I too have the shiny bolt heads. Interested to see how this turns out. I am still playing with pressures on mine, started 75 in the front and 70 in the rear. I was a little heasitant to go too low, but after seeing what you are running I will continue to drop mine until the contact patch is nice and even.
 

Valence

Well-known member
Steel Soldiers Supporter
2,112
555
113
Location
Davis County, UT
When installing the plates I realized I made a logical error. Previously, in Post #17 you can see me measuring the outside lugs to see if there was room for 1/4" plate. The thread left on those outer most lugs do not change. It's the lugs actually pressed into the drum that matter. :doh:

These lugs:
2015-08-28 10.28.17.jpg 2015-08-28 10.28.45.jpg

The good news is I probably could have gone with a 3/8" (maybe even 1/2"?) plate. I have no concerns about mounting duals to the remaining threads.

I then used these black oxide bolts (with new grade 8 lock washers) to replace the 4 hex head bolts that the tires were rubbing on. So even if the tires still rub on the head, it will be a lot nicer on the edge of the tread. I did have to cut the bolts shorter (~5/8" in total length). Just screw on a nut first, cut the bolt to length, use a grinder to bevel the end and when you remove the nut, it'll clean up the threads. (I thank the awesome owner of the local Ace Hardware for distilling that knowledge) [thumbzup]
2015-08-28 12.13.15.jpg 2015-08-28 13.11.46.jpg 2015-08-28 12.15.42.jpg

And here's some before and after comparisons of the clearance as the truck sat in my garage.
Passenger Side:
(Note, in the first picture, the tire on the left has the spacer, the tire on the right does not. In the second picture, both have the spacer.)
2015-08-28 12.23.13.jpg 2015-08-28 16.03.45.jpg

Driver's Side:
2015-08-28 12.23.33.jpg 2015-08-28 14.42.36.jpg
 
Last edited:

Valence

Well-known member
Steel Soldiers Supporter
2,112
555
113
Location
Davis County, UT
Driver's side close ups:

Here you can see that the front most rear axle on the driver's side has been rubbing even past the bolt head, on the trunnion cap.
2015-08-28 13.14.39.jpg

2015-08-28 13.15.29.jpg 2015-08-28 13.15.43.jpg 2015-08-28 14.43.29.jpg 2015-08-28 14.45.19.jpg
 

Valence

Well-known member
Steel Soldiers Supporter
2,112
555
113
Location
Davis County, UT
In summary, I think the the front most rear driver's side tire may still rub a little as it was obviously the worst offender (visible by all the little rubber particles strewn all over). It was a lot of work as these G177's are HEAVY!

Worth it? Absolutely!

Changes I'd make if I were to do again knowing what I know now:
Maybe order 3/8" plates, but I'm still perfectly happy!
 
Last edited:

Valence

Well-known member
Steel Soldiers Supporter
2,112
555
113
Location
Davis County, UT
From the inspiration of peashooter putting the 395's on his M105 trailer, I wanted my M105 trailer to run the same tires as my deuce. The Goodyear G177's fit great! Since there is no hub on the axle to for the wheel to rest on, I recommend a crow bar (I used a 42" one from Lowes) to help lift the tire so the wheel can be centered and the tapered lug nuts properly seated. Here's a few pictures to show clearance, which seems plenty to me.
2015-09-11 14.31.51.jpg 2015-09-11 14.32.19.jpg 2015-09-11 14.32.33.jpg 2015-09-11 14.34.29 HDR.jpg 2015-09-11 14.36.13 HDR.jpg 2015-09-11 14.36.24.jpg

On an empty trailer, at 30 PSI it can be seen that the edges of the tire still aren't making full contact with the ground. So I will need to go lower, but a little sidewall bulge just started to show:
2015-09-11 15.41.22.jpg 2015-09-11 15.51.58 HDR.jpg
 
Last edited:

Valence

Well-known member
Steel Soldiers Supporter
2,112
555
113
Location
Davis County, UT
Also, the largest tire covers that I could easily find, fit very well too, albeit a bit tight around the square shoulders of the tread.

Ultra Tyre Gard
for 43"-45", white
$50 shipped (unfortunately about twice the cost of the tire covers I had for the NDTs)
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B008SUG39G

I taped a piece of cardboard on the inside of the tire cover right where the lug nuts would be to help prevent premature tire cover wear (Not pictured).

2015-09-11 15.56.28.jpg 2015-09-11 15.58.19 HDR.jpg 2015-09-11 16.04.51.jpg 2015-09-11 16.05.10.jpg
 
Last edited:

Valence

Well-known member
Steel Soldiers Supporter
2,112
555
113
Location
Davis County, UT
I want to change my deuce's speedometer adapter (the 90 degree elbow between the transfer case and the speedometer cable) so that my speedometer would read closer to accurate with the new 11.00R20's - without paying a shop to re-gear the stock adapter.

However, I had to get out the shovel and dig, and even a phone call to the Kinder/Gentler Ron (73m819), as often it was just thrown around "get a 5-ton speedometer adapter". That was never very helpful as there are many different 5-tons out there that also come with 11.00, 14.00, or other super single tires. I thought I'd compile my findings for all, and for my own selfish ease of future reference.
[HR][/HR]
M44 Series (2.5 ton)

Cross links to other helpful posts:
http://www.steelsoldiers.com/showth...-cable-adapter&p=310557&viewfull=1#post310557
http://www.steelsoldiers.com/showth...-recalibration&p=342098&viewfull=1#post342098

In the Deuce "TM9-2320-209-20P Organization level - Maintenance M35 Multifuel repair parts and special tools" it lists the following (images partially stolen from cranetrucks' post)

M44_speedometer_adapter_1of2_TM_20P.png M44_speedometer_adapter_2of2_TM_20P.jpg


There are 2 types available:

For the 9.00 tires


For the 11.00 tires

[HR][/HR]
M39 Series (5 ton)
In the "TM9-2320-211-20P Organizational level Parts and special tool lists M39 Series 6x6 5 Ton" it lists the following:

M39_speedometer_adapter_1of2_TM_20P.jpg M39_speedometer_adapter_2of2_TM_20P.jpg

Looking up each item #14 from the above list:








[HR][/HR]
M809 Series (5 ton)
For the record, this is why people hate looking at the TMs
(It also doesn't help in the TM section there are 2 different posts for both M809 and M939 series)


In the "TM9-2320-260-34-2 Direct Support and General Support Maintenance M809 series 2 of 2" it lists the following:

M809_speedometer_adapter_1of2_TM_34P-2.png M809_speedometer_adapter_2of2_TM_34P-2.png
If you compare all the #7's in the parts list with the -24P-2 below, the first one is not listed in the -24P-2 below. So looking it up:



Looking at "TM 9-2320-260-24P-2 - Parts Manual M809 Series Trucks"
The figure is the same, but the parts list has a little different information:

M809_speedometer_adapter_1of2_TM_24P-2.png M809_speedometer_adapter_2of2_TM_24P-2.jpg

Looking up the NSNs on PartTarget.com
http://www.parttarget.com/3010-00-7...23.html/-E6AA2B9B-9D34-408E-85D4-41C837C7A739


http://www.parttarget.com/2520-00-7...ption=nsn&originalsearchtext=2520-00-715-3866

[HR][/HR]
M939 Series (5 ton)
In the "TM9-2320-272-24P-2 Unit, Direct and General support parts and special tools manual for the M939 series truck. 2 of 2. Feb 1999" it lists the following:

M939_speedometer_adapter_1of2_TM_24P-2.png M939_speedometer_adapter_2of2_TM_24P-2.png

Looking up item #11 from the parts list:


[HR][/HR]
Conclusion #1:
For the M35A2 axle gear ratio, the 1:200 speedometer adapter (NSN 2520-00-404-3098 ) is what I would want, though I wouldn't expect the speedometer reading to still be 100% accurate as actual tire diameter even between different 11:00's is different (NDT vs Goodyear vs Michelin etc...), but it would be very close.

An alternative is to go for a 5-ton 1:222 Speedometer adapter from the M39 or M809 series (NSN 2520-00-740-9623) though speedometer readings would still be a little off, but should closer than the deuce's stock 1:187 speedometer adapter because of the 5-ton axle gear ratio of 1:6.44 vs the deuce of 1:6.72.

I shall leave it as an exercise for the reader to calculate percent error differences.
[HR][/HR]Update: 09/29/2015
In a different thread the question was posed:

I'm running 395s, I would think a different ratio would get my speedo closer. What are the benefits? Where do you find the part?
Changing the speedometer adapter will result in a closer speedometer reading and thus, more accurate mileage count on the speedometer. You can "do the math" to calculate the difference between your displayed speedometer reading versus your actual.

Various vendors have speedometer adapters. The 1:200 is hard to find. At the time of this writing I have only contacted 2 places and I was quoted:
$85.00 Big Mike's Motor Pool
~$100 Boyce Equipment (they sounded like they weren't real firm on the price and would probably "price match")

Further Update: Boyce Equipment was confused on what I wanted and only had 1:222 adapters. Big Mike's Motor Pool had an item with the right part number (which I ordered) but it turned out to be a tachometer. The NSN for the 1:200 does say "Speedometer-Tachometer" so you better have the place physically LOOK at the item to ensure it is a speedometer adapter and not a tachometer! At the time of this writing (12/05/2015), I plan to perhaps pursue a business that can re-gear the stock adapter to said 1:200 ratio. If that does occur, you'll have to look later in this thread (reaching the date limit of updating this post).

I believe "The Math" is just a ratio/percentage change/comparison. For reference, here is an image often used here on SteelSoldiers for different tire sizes:
tiresize.jpg

For example:
The stock M35A2 runs 9.00R20's and are about 40.5" in diameter. The stock 0.187 ratio speedometer adapter reads, for our purposes, relatively accurate. My tires are Goodyear G177s 11.00R20. According to Goodyear's website they are 43.7" in diameter.

Do "The Math":
NOTE:
There is error in these calculations as it assumes the NDTs and stock 1:187 adapter are 100% accurate, which is surely not the case as even the tire's diameter changes as tread wears.

43.7 divided by 40.5 = 1.0790
This means that the Goodyear's are 7.9% taller than the 9.00R20 NDTs.

200 divided by 187 = 1.0695
This means that the 1:200 adapter turns 6.95% faster than the stock 1:187 adapter.

This means that a truck running Goodyear G177 11.00R20's with a 1:200 speedometer adapter will *still* have an error of 7.9% - 6.95% = 0.9494%, or that what is seen on the speedometer will still be 0.9494% under actual. If the speedometer reads 50 mph the actual speed will be about 1.009494 times faster, or ~50.47 MPH. Personally, I consider a 1% error negligible.


Lets do the same for the 395/85R20's as listed in the chart:
46 divided by 40.5 = 1.1358
This means that the 395's are 13.58% taller than the 9.00R20 NDTs.

You would then need a speedometer adapter that turns at about 13.5% faster than the stock 1:187.
Lets work it backwards here:
Let x equal the exact ratio of an adapter needed such that 395's read as accurately as the 9.00R20 NDTs.
x divided by 187 = 1.1358
x = 1.1358 * 187
x = 212.395
This means, for a, relatively, accurate speedometer reading, you need to have a speedometer with about a 1:212 ratio (certain businesses can re-gear speedometers/adapters, but I'm sure it will be a bit pricey). If you put the 1:200 ratio speedometer adapter in your truck it would still read lower than your actual speed.

There are other ratio options from various 5-ton trucks with higher speedometer ratios, but we cannot just use those numbers directly. Remember, the 2.5 ton Rockwell axles have a 1:6.72 gear ratio, while the 5-ton Rockwell axles have a 1:6.44 gear ratio so we have to take that into consideration too!

Back to the drawing board:
6.44 divided by 6.72 = 0.9583
This means that the 5 ton axles turn at 95.83% the speed of the deuce axle. This means they turn (1 - 0.9583) 4.17% slower because they are geared higher.

Note: Needing to down convert the 5-ton's adapter ratio's for the deuce is supported by the fact that the M39 Series TM does state the use of the 1:222 adapter with 11.00R20s, while the M44 Series TM (the deuce's) states to use the 1:200 adapter. The 5-ton adapter wouldn't need to spin faster if it's axles weren't geared higher.

Incomplete information: There is the possibility of some complete information (or something I missed) as the 5 ton 1:222 adapter spins 11% faster than the deuce's 1:200 adapter and that difference does not appear to be fully accounted for by the axle gearing alone (about a 4% difference). However, I still feel that the results are worthwhile and useful.

For reference:
http://www.steelsoldiers.com/showthread.php?59654-M818-Transfer-Case-Upgrade-T-138-to-T-1138
M809 Series Transfer case gearing ratio:
T-138:
High: 1:1 ?
Low: ?

M939 Transfer case gearing ratio:
T-1138:
High: 0.732:1
Low: 1.72:1

What if the various 5-ton speedometer adapters were placed in the deuce, what would be their equivalent reading?
Assuming the speedometer adapters universally fit into the deuce transfer case, the quoted ratios would need to be converted to account for the difference in the axle gear ratio.


The 5-tons have multiple speedometer adapters:
1:222
1:235
1:250
1:1.130 (M939 Series - I'm not convinced these will fit in a deuce transfer case - I'm also not sure what "1.130" means in relation to the how the TMs treat "1:222" to equal "0.222")

We need to multiply each of the above by 0.9583
1:222 -> 212.75
1:235 -> ~225.208
1:250 -> ~239.583
1:1.130 -> ~1.083

Now we can start to get excited!
From the math we did above, a deuce running 395's we needed a speedometer adapter with a 1:212.395 ratio. We just found out that the 5-ton 1:222 speedometer adapter in a deuce will have an equivalent ratio of 212.75.

What is the approximate error as seen on speedometer on the dash?
As calculated previously:
46 divided by 40.5 = 1.1358
This means that the 395's are 13.58% taller than the 9.00R20 NDTs.

212.75 divided by 187 = 1.1377
This means that the 5-ton 1:222 speedometer adapter, in a deuce, would turn 13.77% faster than the stock 1:187 adapter.

This means that a deuce running 395/85R20's with a 5-ton 1:222 speedometer adapter will have an error of 13.58% - 13.77% = -0.1898%, or that what is seen on the speedometer will be 0.1898% over actual. If the speedometer reads 50 mph the actual speed will be about 0.9981 times that, or ~49.91 MPH. That is one accurate match!

What if the 5-ton 1:222 speedometer adapter was used on a deuce, running Goodyear G177 11.00R20s? How far off would the speedometer gauge read then?
As calculated previously:
43.7 divided by 40.5 = 1.0790
This means that the Goodyear's are 7.9% taller than the 9.00R20 NDTs.

212.75 divided by 187 = 1.1377
This means that the 5-ton 1:222 speedometer adapter, in a deuce, would turn 13.77% faster than the stock 1:187 adapter.

This means that a deuce running Goodyear G177 11.00R20s with a 5-ton 1:222 speedometer adapter will have an error of 7.9% - 13.77% = -5.87%, or that what is seen on the speedometer will be 5.87% over actual. If the speedometer reads 50 mph the actual speed will be about 0.9413 times that, or ~47.07 MPH.

[HR][/HR] Conclusion #2
I believe this means that an M39 or M809 series 5 ton 1:222 speedometer adapter is a perfect fit for a deuce running 395s with only about a 0.2% error (over)! Also, a deuce with the Goodyear G177 11.00R20s using a 1:200 speedometer adapter is only about a 1% error (under)! Both those seem great to me. Also, for Goodyear G177 11.00R20 tires, the 1:222 adapter is a slightly closer match than the stock adapter with about a 5.87% error (over reading) vs 7.9% error (under reading) which is about a 2.03% improvement on gauge accuracy.

Note: I would love for someone with a good GPS who's made any of these conversions to report how close my rough calculations are to reality.

Warning: This assumes that 5-ton speedometers fit without issue in the deuce transfer case and on the deuce speedometer cable. I have no experience to speak on the matter whether or not they do as I've only taken other's word for it. Update 11/22/2015: Jeepsinker has confirmed that the M809 Series 5-ton adapters do fit the deuce transfer case.
 
Last edited:

clinto

Moderator, wonderful human being & practicing Deuc
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Steel Soldiers Supporter
Supporting Vendor
12,596
1,131
113
Location
Athens, Ga.
I don't get why people have to change things that work well to begin with. must have too much money?? each to their own I guess.
Are you referring to the radial tire upgrade? Because I have about $1900 in my G177 upgrade and I have absolutely no doubt that in the long run, I will save money. The lifespan of modern radials like the G177 is so much longer than the soft bias ply NDT or NDCC tires that they aren't even in the same stratosphere.

The caster update is simply a necessity from running radials. A radial tire wants more positive caster than a bias ply.
 

TB58

Member
289
2
18
Location
Fayetteville, Nc
That is some great info. Thank you for doing all that digging. Now on my list of things to do as time allows. I went with the radials because I am driving mine daily, allows better speed with lower RPM and better safety on wet roads. Having an accurate spedo is a detail that is very nice to have. Yes you can just do the math, but it is much easier to track mileage when your speedo is correct.
 

Valence

Well-known member
Steel Soldiers Supporter
2,112
555
113
Location
Davis County, UT
I don't get why people have to change things that work well to begin with. must have too much money?? each to their own I guess.
I'm actually working on modifying my deuce to be a desert prerunner, but ya'll just can't see the designs yet.

L.O.L.
:gimp2:
 

Valence

Well-known member
Steel Soldiers Supporter
2,112
555
113
Location
Davis County, UT
I don't get why people have to change things that work well to begin with. must have too much money?? each to their own I guess.
In all seriousness:

Not every person's end use or goal is the same. I changed my tires for a number of reasons:
  • Availability of tires (MV stuff is harder to come by and more expensive where I live, and suddenly the G177's were available for me at a price I could agree too)
  • Winter traction
  • Higher speed at same RPM
  • NDT Tire cupping issue
  • I primarily drive on pavement, but I still want excellent performance in dirt, snow, ice, mud, or even just on a wet road.
  • Better handling (after caster adjustment)
  • Easier steering
 
Last edited:

Valence

Well-known member
Steel Soldiers Supporter
2,112
555
113
Location
Davis County, UT
Busy busy man. I wish I had more time to fiddle with my truck.
I'm trying really hard to get my deuce to where it feels as well maintained and reliable as a daily driver. Even then, I still want to work on it less and do more :driver:


That is some great info. Thank you for doing all that digging. Now on my list of things to do as time allows. I went with the radials because I am driving mine daily, allows better speed with lower RPM and better safety on wet roads. Having an accurate spedo is a detail that is very nice to have. Yes you can just do the math, but it is much easier to track mileage when your speedo is correct.
You are very welcome. Honestly, one of my main points in taking so much time to post on SteelSoldiers is I hope I can help others to repay all the help I've received. And also to share my experiences/results where I feel little or no information exists.
 
Last edited:

FarmerRob

Member
151
2
18
Location
Chandler, TX
Any reason (besides looks) that you didn't want to go singles with a hub flip in the rear? It would solve all your clearance issues (without the spacers, even), lose a lot of weight, increase your ground pressure (and traction) and not decrease your carrying capacity. Other than aesthetics, there's no down side.
 

red

Active member
1,988
25
38
Location
Eagle Mountain/Utah
Any reason (besides looks) that you didn't want to go singles with a hub flip in the rear? It would solve all your clearance issues (without the spacers, even), lose a lot of weight, increase your ground pressure (and traction) and not decrease your carrying capacity. Other than aesthetics, there's no down side.
I tried to talk him into that, he's stubborn haha
 

Valence

Well-known member
Steel Soldiers Supporter
2,112
555
113
Location
Davis County, UT
Any reason (besides looks) that you didn't want to go singles with a hub flip in the rear? It would solve all your clearance issues (without the spacers, even), lose a lot of weight, increase your ground pressure (and traction) and not decrease your carrying capacity. Other than aesthetics, there's no down side.
Honestly, not a lot of other reasons, no. More spares and it was less work not to flip the hubs. (I realize the irony that one has to "work" for the money for 4 more tires, but you get my point).
 
Last edited:
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website like our supporting vendors. Their ads help keep Steel Soldiers going. Please consider disabling your ad blockers for the site. Thanks!

I've Disabled AdBlock
No Thanks