ncduece
Member
- 138
- 1
- 18
- Location
- wilmington nc
I just purchased a m49a2c and have no need for the tank bed. i understand these are made of stainless steel. just wondering what its value might be, sale vs scrap? i might be interested in trading.
Steel Soldiers now has a few new forums, read more about it at: New Munitions Forums!
We need more people on here like you!My two cents are that the "special" versions of the M44 chassis are becoming somewhat rare. It is your truck, you bought it, you can do what you want, even send it for scrap as-is. Not for anybody else to tell you what to do.
If it was me, I would attempt to keep it original and trade it for the truck that I do want; a bobber or a cargo truck or....rather than dismantling and/or scrapping yet another M49.
This has happened to me A LOT. It really bugs me, but it is a free country, (for now) so he has the right to do whatever he wants to the truck as well. It just eats me up when people leave perfectly good equipment to rot.I know a guy that got a 49 charlie and wanted to remove the tank and put a bed on it!! I had 3 deuces at the time and I offered to trade him!!! His had been sitting from airfield to airfield so it only had 9,000 mi on it. It needed to be gone through but yet he still did not want a ready to go truck because mine had 19,000 on it.
Last I knew, its still sitting on the farm with the tank on it.
I bet the ratio was MUCH higher than that, I don't recall seeing many at all. No unit I was ever in had one.I traded my bobber for a tank truck that came out of south Florida...it was a rust bucket and I ended up scrapping it. After I cut all the carbon steel off of it I got about 600 bucks for the stainless steel tank.
I agree that if you can keep it as a tanker and get another truck you would be ahead of the game......they are not super rare but they are uncommon.
Not all military units had a fuel or water tanker. I think the ratio of tankers to cargo trucks was about 10 to one in favor of the cargos.
Ditto. I never saw any when I was in either.I bet the ratio was MUCH higher than that, I don't recall seeing many at all. No unit I was ever in had one.
Thanks, and I know a few people that would argue that even one of me is too many!We need more people on here like you!
It's likely that no line companies ever had them. Usually it's the BN-HQ or HHC company that fields the fuel trucks. The last armor battalion I was in had about 40 gas-powered vehicles left by the mid-1980's, in the form of M151's, M880's, M886's, about seven gas deuces and about ten gas 5-tons remained. They had gotten rid of the gas M113's and M114's by 1983. There were only two 49-Charlie's in the battalion. They both only hauled MOGAS, one of which was gas-powered. The rest of the BN's vehicles including armor at the time were diesel/multifuel, and were fueled by a handful of the BN's 5-ton cargo's with T&P setups. Two of those diesel T&P's were gas-powered. Go figure. Thus, that BN's M49C ratio was about 20:1.I bet the ratio was MUCH higher than that, I don't recall seeing many at all. No unit I was ever in had one.
I was in a Brigade HHC motor section, and we had one deuce with two 300 gal. fuel pods, and a trailer with another pod in it. That's it. I think one year we went to AT with 110 vehicles in our motor pool, and that's the only fueling capability our unit had. We had a unit that would set up fuel stations though, can't remember if it was part of the Engineers or a supply company. They had the semi tankers. They had enough to fuel the brigade on the main move to Camp Grayling in Mi.It's likely that no line companies ever had them. Usually it's the BN-HQ or HHC company that fields the fuel trucks. The last armor battalion I was in had about 40 gas-powered vehicles left by the mid-1980's, in the form of M151's, M880's, M886's, about seven gas deuces and about ten gas 5-tons remained. They had gotten rid of the gas M113's and M114's by 1983. There were only two 49-Charlie's in the battalion. They both only hauled MOGAS, one of which was gas-powered. The rest of the BN's vehicles including armor at the time were diesel/multifuel, and were fueled by a handful of the BN's 5-ton cargo's with T&P setups. Two of those diesel T&P's were gas-powered. Go figure. Thus, that BN's M49C ratio was about 20:1.