• Steel Soldiers now has a few new forums, read more about it at: New Munitions Forums!

  • Microsoft MSN, Live, Hotmail, Outlook email users may not be receiving emails. We are working to resolve this issue. Please add support@steelsoldiers.com to your trusted contacts.

Not your regular Bobbed 6x6

98G

98G

Former SSG
Steel Soldiers Supporter
6,069
4,430
113
Location
AZ/KS/MO/OK/NM/NE, varies by the day...
Recovry4x4 said:
Can these transfer cases be swapped into the M39 series of 5 tons without too much difficulty? Assuming they are air shaft rather than sprag type?
Click to expand...
They're air shift.

The ratios aren't the same. It really isn't worth mating up the Tcase out of the M939series with the transmission out of the M809series as you end up with a gear or two that aren't useful.

I'm thinking the M39 series is the same as the M809series except for the engine. Correct me if I'm wrong.

I'm guessing that your potential motivation to do so would be to ditch the sprag in favor of air shift. My opinion is that losing the robustness of the T138 to get the air shift of the T1138 isn't really an upgrade, even before you figure in final drive ratios. (I own both 939 and 809 trucks. I have no "mine is better" bias.)

Wandering off topic, my experience has been that the 809series trucks perform pretty well even without lockers. I got one stuck in soft mud and buried it to the axles. The sprag worked like it was supposed to, and it was spinning all 10 wheels. I did finally get it free under its own power.

A word or two on 16.00's. They noticeably rob bottom end power. To the point that it effects driveability. This is less of an issue in 809series trucks than in 939series trucks. It's like every gear is one gear higher than before.. I have 16.00s on my M925 and end up using the Allison auto like a manual transmission. Running around on back roads at 45mph i end up holding it in 4th gear and really only see 5th for the interstate or higher speed highways. If your truck actually works for a living you may want to consider 395's. 395's are considerably cheaper than 16.00s, and don't take nearly as much away from the bottom end. If you're planning on doing low speed and heavy, 395's are worth a look.
 
tobyS

tobyS

Well-known member
4,832
833
113
Location
IN
SyrionDeathvow said:
I'm not sure if the TC (1138) of the 818 can handle backing in low, but with 16.00 it will matter.

what do you mean? Why wouldnt a transfer case be able to do reverse?
Click to expand...
Transfer case in the 939 series can break under load when in low range and reversing. There is a plaquard that makes the warning on the 939 dash. By conversation above, you will have the T138.

With the much larger diameter tires, the torque on each axle is increased significantly also, so getting stuck can turn into broken TC in 939 series, just "rocking". I'm still not clear if the T138 has the same problem as the T1138 ( will re-read above).

Myself...I would make a 4x4, with dif. locks on the rear and air lock differential on the front. Shed a rear axle, put on springs & shock(s) with air bags for heavy load. You could shorten your cargo to around a tractor at the same time and put a 105 bed on it. Below is my deuce with spring and bag FYI.
 

Attachments

Tow4

Tow4

Well-known member
Steel Soldiers Supporter
2,096
646
113
Location
Orlando, FL
98G said:
The 939series 5ton trucks have a 10:1 reverse gear. In low range, this is enough torque to break the transfer cases. Thus you can't back up in low range reverse in those trucks.

Not an issue in the older trucks.
Click to expand...
Just remove the washer on the transfer case shift rod that automatically engages the front drive and you won't have any problems using reverse. You can engage the front drive with the switch on the dash if needed.
 
98G

98G

Former SSG
Steel Soldiers Supporter
6,069
4,430
113
Location
AZ/KS/MO/OK/NM/NE, varies by the day...
Tow4 said:
Just remove the washer on the transfer case shift rod that automatically engages the front drive and you won't have any problems using reverse. You can engage the front drive with the switch on the dash if needed.
Click to expand...
I like that mod because it gives you high and low 6x4 and high and low 6x6.

While it removes some of the bind on the t-case in low range by not forcing low to always be in 6wd , it doesn't resolve it completely and low range reverse still runs a risk of breaking the t case.
 
R

royalflush55

Well-known member
Steel Soldiers Supporter
653
533
93
Location
Reydon, OK
Recovry4x4 said:
It's not going to matter where you drive or if you are in 2WD 4x4 or 6x6, that pesky steering geometry is going to be an issue.....but only if you turn.

Let me add this though, GM didn't compensate for ackerman angles on the 73-87 trucks. They were the same for blazers at 106" WB all the way to 164.5" WB of the crew cab. Maybe it won't be as much of an issue as I thought.
Click to expand...
I do know the short WB ones are a lot harder on U joints!
 
Recovry4x4

Recovry4x4

LLM/Member 785
Super Moderator
Steel Soldiers Supporter
34,012
1,808
113
Location
GA Mountains
Yeah, that's hotshotable. There are guys with the 4500 and 5500 truck towing up around 25,000. WO/W M52A2 is only 17840#
 
m715mike

m715mike

Well-known member
2,797
3,823
113
Location
Montgomery, Texas
Your video makes reference to the advice given about pulling your new truck home with an 18 wheeler. I believe when that advice was given in your other thread, they were discussing flat towing the truck. Putting it on a trailer is a whole different ball game!

That was a cool video! Congrats on getting her home! And, I’m looking forward to watching your build!
 
S

SyrionDeathvow

Member
53
21
8
Location
South carolina
Flat towing, trailer towing, the guys on here were all but certain a regular truck couldn't do it. Honestly i was worried about the dude coming down the mountain with it. Either way, you guys probly saved my ass in more ways than one.
 
S

SyrionDeathvow

Member
53
21
8
Location
South carolina
I was talking to a bunch a people on a bunch of forums. It may not have been one of the steel soldiers guys. Either way there were a bunch of nay sayers. I thank the communities for all the input, it got here safely and nobody got hurt/tickets. I'll be happy to post pics of it when im done building it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
110,879members
165,312threads
2,326,207posts
2,003online users
Top
✖
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website like our supporting vendors. Their ads help keep Steel Soldiers going. Please consider disabling your ad blockers for the site. Thanks!

I've Disabled AdBlock
No Thanks