bajajoaquin
Member
- 29
- 5
- 8
- Location
- San Diego
Hi, all. I'm a fairly new member, who's been mostly lurking while shopping for my first Deuce. Since I'm in California, the licensing laws are of particular concern. While reading posts, I came across this from jpinst:
"I dont want to beat a dead horse, but this lawyer has researched the sh%t out of those alleged laws, and it just does is not the case. Only applies to 3 axeld "commercial vehicle." The test lies in the definition of commercial vehicle, not the description of who needs a CDL. An MV does not fit the test of commercial vehicle, and twisting the definition it to try and make it fit is not how the law is construed. Read the legislative commnts and the case law. Ok I'm Done."
So I've done some searching in the vehicle codes. Here's what I've found:
1. Section 260, "Definitions:"
260. (a) A "commercial vehicle" is a motor vehicle of a type required to be registered under this code used or maintained for the transportation of persons for hire, compensation, or profit or designed, used, or maintained primarily for the transportation of property.
...
(d) The definition of a commercial vehicle in this section does not apply to Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 15200) of Division 6.
2. Section 15200, "Legislative Intent:"
15200. It is the intent of the Legislature, in enacting this chapter, ... to reduce or prevent commercial motor vehicle accidents....
To the extent that this chapter conflicts with general driver licensing provisions, this chapter shall prevail. Where this chapter is silent, the general driver licensing provisions shall apply.
3. Section 15210, "Definitions:"
(b) (1) "Commercial motor vehicle" means any vehicle or combination of vehicles that requires a class A or class B license, or a class C license with an endorsement issued pursuant to paragraph ( )1 (5) of subdivision (a) of Section 15278
4. California Commercial Driver's Handbook:
To operate commercial vehicles, you must apply for a CDL.
A commercial motor vehicle is a motor vehicle or combination of vehicles designed or used for either the transportation of persons for compensation or property and:
The deuce was not designed, and will not be maintained or used (by me) in the pursuit of payment, so is therefore not a commercial vehicle.
However, I can't find the exact vehicle code that actually defines the license types. Nor can I find the case law he describes. Depending on the language, these two requirements could trump the commercial vehicle definition.
Perhaps jpinst will join us and add more clarity?
"I dont want to beat a dead horse, but this lawyer has researched the sh%t out of those alleged laws, and it just does is not the case. Only applies to 3 axeld "commercial vehicle." The test lies in the definition of commercial vehicle, not the description of who needs a CDL. An MV does not fit the test of commercial vehicle, and twisting the definition it to try and make it fit is not how the law is construed. Read the legislative commnts and the case law. Ok I'm Done."
So I've done some searching in the vehicle codes. Here's what I've found:
1. Section 260, "Definitions:"
260. (a) A "commercial vehicle" is a motor vehicle of a type required to be registered under this code used or maintained for the transportation of persons for hire, compensation, or profit or designed, used, or maintained primarily for the transportation of property.
...
(d) The definition of a commercial vehicle in this section does not apply to Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 15200) of Division 6.
2. Section 15200, "Legislative Intent:"
15200. It is the intent of the Legislature, in enacting this chapter, ... to reduce or prevent commercial motor vehicle accidents....
To the extent that this chapter conflicts with general driver licensing provisions, this chapter shall prevail. Where this chapter is silent, the general driver licensing provisions shall apply.
3. Section 15210, "Definitions:"
(b) (1) "Commercial motor vehicle" means any vehicle or combination of vehicles that requires a class A or class B license, or a class C license with an endorsement issued pursuant to paragraph ( )1 (5) of subdivision (a) of Section 15278
4. California Commercial Driver's Handbook:
To operate commercial vehicles, you must apply for a CDL.
A commercial motor vehicle is a motor vehicle or combination of vehicles designed or used for either the transportation of persons for compensation or property and:
- Has a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of 26,001 pounds or more.
- Tows any vehicle with a GVWR of 10,001 pounds or more.
- Tows more than one vehicle or a trailer bus.
- Has three or more axles (excludes three axle vehicles weighing 6,000 pounds or less gross).
- Is any vehicle (bus, farm labor vehicle, general public paratransit vehicle, etc.) designed, used, or maintained to carry more than 10 passengers including the driver, for hire or profit, or is used by any nonprofit organization or group.
The deuce was not designed, and will not be maintained or used (by me) in the pursuit of payment, so is therefore not a commercial vehicle.
However, I can't find the exact vehicle code that actually defines the license types. Nor can I find the case law he describes. Depending on the language, these two requirements could trump the commercial vehicle definition.
Perhaps jpinst will join us and add more clarity?