Volvo740turbo
New member
- 281
- 0
- 0
- Location
- St.louis missouri
The spicer number cross references to the 534g that I have installed.....i guess the yoke is worn out then...
Steel Soldiers now has a few new forums, read more about it at: New Munitions Forums!
Part#: 9980884 |
You might want to review that info because it is not correct.If your yokes are worn and the tolerance is larger than 1.125 inches you can try MOOG 231. It has the same measurements across from cap to cap at 3.667 inches but the caps are slightly larger at 1.18 inches in diameter on all 4. If all 4 yoke holes aren't worn, which isn't a very likely case, you can try MOOG 459 I think it was. Again, it has the same measurements across from cap to cap at 3.667 inches and one set of caps is 1.125 inches in diameter and the other set of caps is larger at 1.18 inches in diameter. These last two MOOG numbers aren't likely to fit the driveline but im just giving measurements in case someone needs something a little bigger.
I appreciate the feedback. I wasn't trying to mislead anybody. I was just throwing out some measurements from all the u joints I bought. I was trying to be careful with my wording and wasn't trying to make improper recommendations. I was careful to say at the end of that statement that those last 2 part numbers I had talked about were not likely to fit the driveline. If any of that information does not need to be there I will gladly take it down or it can be taken down. I agree with you that if the yoke is that worn that it all would need to be replaced. Thanks again for the feedback and I apologize for the wrong information.You might want to review that info because it is not correct.
And BTW, if a yoke is worn - or in this case the saddles wallowed-out - it needs to be replaced! A U-joint with Ø 1.188" bearings will never fit into a yoke made for Ø 1.125" bearings, no matter how badly worn-out it was. For what it matters, the difference in diameter is huge, not just "slightly larger"...
Thank you for the information. I used the ball joint/u joint press for the install and was much happier with that process. I also noticed there wasn't anything on the straps to keep the u joint from sliding around in the yoke so I was sure to install the c clips. I did the pair of the u joints on the rear driveline. Would it be advised to do the front driveline and axle joints now too? Thank youI have changed many U joints. A hammer and socket is a last resort. I should say never to seldom. A C-clamp U joint/ball joint press works best and is much easier on the U joint. I never melted the nylon out either. It was that old and brittle it disintegrates when I press the joint out.
Also the rear U joint on the M1009 has no out shoulders or stops to keep the U joint centered. The C clips must be applied to the caps that get seated in the yoke. This keeps the rear U joint properly seated and centered in the Yoke. View attachment 833335 With out these clips the joint can move from side to side and eventually wear out the yoke, vibrate or worst case come off at high speed. I seen many M1009's with out the clips installed. I hope that helps. I always recommend changing U joints in pairs. If one goes bad who knows the condition of the other one. I even change U joints if the transmission yoke is flopping around loosely when I am handing the drive shaft. That is not supposed to be that loose. Good Luck and Take Care.
We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website like our supporting vendors. Their ads help keep Steel Soldiers going. Please consider disabling your ad blockers for the site. Thanks!